Friday, September 9, 2011

Two classes

"There have ever been two classes among those who profess to be followers of Christ. While one class study the Saviour's life and earnestly seek to correct their defects and to conform to the Pattern, the other class shun the plain, practical truths which expose their errors. Even in her best estate the church was not composed wholly of the true, pure, and sincere. Our Savior taught that those who willfully indulge in sin are not to be received into the church; yet He connected with Himself men who were faulty in character, and granted them the benefits of His teachings and example, that they might have an opportunity to see and example, that they might have an opportunity to see and correct their errors.

But there is no union between the Prince of light and the prince of darkness, and there can be no union between their followers. When Christians consented to unite with those who were but half converted from paganism, they entered upon a path which led farther and farther from the truth. Satan exulted that he had succeeded in deceiving so large a number of followers of Christ. He then brought his power to bear more fully upon them, and inspired them to persecute those who remained true to God. None could so well understand how to oppose the true Christian faith as could those who had once been its defenders; and there apostate Christians, uniting with their half-pagan companions, directed their warfare against the most essential features of the doctrines of Christ.

It required a desperate struggle for those who would be faithful to stand firm against the deceptions and abominations which were disguised in sacerdotal garments and introduced into the church. The Bible was not accepted as the standard of faith. The doctrine of religious freedom was termed heresy, and its upholders were hated and proscribed.

After a long and severe conflict the faithful few decided to dissolve all union with the apostate church if she still refused to free herself from falsehood and idolatry. They saw that separation was an absolute neccessity if they would obey the Word of God They dared not tolerate errors fatal to their own souls and set an example which would imperil the faith of their children and children's children. To secure peace and unity they were ready to make any concession consistent with fidelity to God; buy they felt that even peace would be too dearly purchased as the sacrifice of principle. If unity could be secured only by the compromise of truth and righteousness, then let there be difference, and even war. Well would it be for the church and the world if the principles that actuated those steadfast souls were revived in the hears of God's professed people.

The apostle Paul declares that "all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution." 2 Tim. 3:12. Why is it, then, that persecution seems in a great degree to slumber? The only reason is that the church has conformed to the world's standard, and therefore awakens no opposition. The religion current in our day is not of the days of Christ and His apostles. It is only because of the spirit of compromise with sin, because the great truths of the Word of God are so indifferently regarded, because there is so little vital goodliness in the church, that there be a revival of the faith and power of the early church, and the spirit of persecution will be revived and the fires of persecution will be rekindled."

-The Story of Redemption p323-325

5 comments:

Joel said...

So there's a difference between connection and union? Or is the distinction between the "faulty in character" and the "followers of darkness?" I guess I'm trying to discern what constitutes appropriate interaction...
Thanks for the reminder, Andrew.

Elissa Lombard said...

Thanks for posting this, Andrew. It's a significant reminder that I'm glad I read. I have the exact same questions as Joel.

Andrew Whtilow said...

I added the paragraphs that I left out.

Joel said...

That makes sense. Connections should be made, and should be highly valued, but those in which fidelity to God can be maintained without compromise.

This then leads to a more personal question: are truth and righteousness so deeply engrained within me that I can mingle with men, desiring their good, without sacrificing principle?

Elissa Lombard said...

I come up against that personal question every day here at WAU - no doubt you do at Duke, and SAU, as well. It's always an important question to ask; always worth the wrestle...